The ensuing days after a defeat are always a bit rubbish. The immediate reactions are done with, and everybody’s moaned out, usually within two hours of the match.

But after that calms down there’s still a bubbling current of what is best described as ‘meeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaa.....’-ness, a kind of general pall over what is said and reported, and with the defeat being to Them of all people, it’s somewhat worse than usual.

So it’s no suprise that the talk at the moment is centred around trying to identify exactly what the problem at Arsenal is. Everybody has their own opinion, and the figures of blame are many and varied.

Blame Wenga

In an aside before I start, from attending matches, it’s quite easy to tell what fans think of our manager. Those who are undecided either way or support him tend to pronounce his name as the correct ‘Ven-ger’, while those less keen will use ‘Wen-ger’, ‘Wen-gah’, or my personal favourite ‘Weng-er’, with a soft ‘g’. It’s a highly novel way of nailing your flags to the mast, and one only Arsenal fans could come up with. Congratulations.

David Ornstein from the BBC was on the radio yesterday to re-hash the traditional ‘Arsenal in crisis’ story from this season: That of Arsene Wenger and Steve Bould having a rift over defensive training. His line this time was that Arsene stopped Bould working closely with the defence because he was worried Bould was receiving too much credit for Arsenal’s defensive improvement. Hence various defensive issues have sprung up.

The story has appeared enough to suggest that perhaps Wenger and Bould do have some disagreements, which is healthy really-if the assistant manager kowtowed to everything the manager said it wouldn’t be a healthy working relationship. But to suggest that Arsene Wenger would purposefully make his team worse for the benefit of his reputation is ridiculous. If he wanted to look better he could take credit publicly for the defending, or generally produce better performances from the team.

He was labelled an ‘egotist’ by one journalist yesterday following the report, acting only in his own self-interest. In all honesty, Arsene’s best interests would likely be to leave Arsenal where they are and join PSG or Real Madrid, somewhere where he could win trophies and reclaim his previous high standing. But he won’t. And that tells you all you need to know, really. There’s no denying his stubbornness on and off the pitch is an issue, but to think he’d do something like this is ridiculous. Especially as the likes of Ray Parlour have come out to deny it before, and will again.

It’s the owners!

Stan Kroenke and the Arsenal board come in as a subject of heavy criticism, and Ian Wright today spoke about how the American needs to ‘speak’ to the fans and make clear his intentions, which have been rather misty since he joined.

I can’t say I’m a huge fan of Kroenke, being as he is an investor with little emotional attachment to the club, if any. His American sports teams exist in states of mediocrity, never quite making the cut. There are (founded) fears Arsenal will end up in the same state. However, he’s been unfortunate in that he joined the summer Project Youth fell apart good and proper, with Fabregas and Nasri leaving. The inevitable RVP departure has led to more hostility, combined with his continuing silence.

The possibility of Arab investors making a bid for Arsenal could well put pressure on him, but I wouldn’t count any chickens as far as a U-turn in policy or a takeover is concerned. In fact, I’d probably cook the chickens and enjoy a nice dinner.

Transfer talk

Unsurprisingly, the reports of late have been that Arsene Wenger is targeting the defence as a position of reinforcement in the summer. I’ll be covering the defence later this week, so I’ll simply give the targets and some thoughts:

The Guardian have said Arsene Wenger is looking for a commanding central defender, with Swansea’s Ashley Williams top of the list. The Welsh captain has been impressive this season, and as a captain is vocal both on and off the pitch. Experienced at 28, he’d add a voice to the dressing room, which could be what Arsenal need, though you wonder if looking abroad for a higher class of defender may be more advisable.

As well as this, the Daily Express have linked Arsenal with Galatasaray forward Burak Yilmaz. The Turk is prolific, being one of the Champions League’s top scorers as well as hitting 21 goals in 26 games in the Turkish league. Arsenal were linked with him before he moved to the giants, but the chairman is now quoted as saying he would cost £35 million. That’s bravado (remember Montpelier’s infamously difficult president claiming Olivier Giroud would cost around £40 million), but he wouldn’t be cheap, and playing largely in a fairly weak league means the risk may not match the return. Probably just paper talk.

With no game until next week, I’ll be covering various areas of the pitch and how Arsenal can improve them, as well as the usual transfer speculation and general blather.

Latest:

Follow Arsenal Latest on TwitterRSS FeedFollow Arsenal Latest on facebookSubscribe by email



Follow Arsenal Latest on TwitterRSS FeedArsenal Latest news on FacebookSubscribe by email

Comments  

#12 babasola tokoya 2013-03-09 16:20
I DONT UNDERSTAND WHY PODOSKI A CLINICAL FINISHER is always on the bench and the wasteful slow GIROURD who is slow is always in the starting line upif wenger can play an aggressive hungry team line of 4 4 2 against bayern munich arsenal will win two top strikers PODOSKI AND WALCOTT two fast effective shooting wingers CARZOLA and CHAIMBERLAIN two midfielders WILSHERE N ARTETA defenders VERMALEEN KOSCHIENY MERTESECKAR N SAGNA i will bet that arsenal will beat bayern
#11 AJ 2013-03-09 09:04
For me it has to be wengers fault. His supporters say 'he doesn't have enough money to work with', but look at the players he has brought iin (giroud santos gervinho park ch-young) your're telling me he couldn't get better players than them? Even so, the squad is gd enough to achieve top four. If we don't there is no one else to blame but wenger.
+2 #10 Chinaman 2013-03-07 13:17
There wouldn't have been a problem if our love for the club were simply contractual. We could have walked away at the end of it.

The problem we have is that for us Arsenal is family. We can never disown, never be disloyal. Never walk away.
+1 #9 Alan Radmall 2013-03-06 13:57
BTW - I would immediatly bring Pat Rice back from retirement - and replace Bold with Tony Adams - one of the best defenders and motivators of men in Arsenal's history.
#8 Alan Radmall 2013-03-06 13:54
Barnaby and Indian Gooner - nice points. Is there a problem? At the moment even Man U leading the PL by 12 points cannot compete with Real Madrid - at home. We cannot compete with Man U. So as a club - we have very far to go. 2 additional players will not make the difference we need. We need a new club/business strategy (the Chairman and board) and at least 6 players to leave and to be replaced with better quality players. We cannot reply on those people who have got Arsenal into this position to make these significant changes.
#7 indian gooner 2013-03-06 09:10
What is the problem? where do i start?

a)AW has been tactically inept for as long as we can remember. We all know why he hasnt been a success in Europe, since continental football can be very tactical and hes happy to show how many times hes been in the competition than how many times his presence has actually mattered. The fact that he played an untested formation(with theo leading up front, an ineffective poldi staying as long as 70mins) for an important match like bayern showed the huge hole in his tactical brain.

b)Personnel -Most of our players are being trained to play just one touch with no variety to their games. Most of our players are trained out of shooting from a distance, using the other foot for passing or dribbling or heading. Most of our players cant score from freekicks, deadball situations or create something magical out of nothing. I blame the coaching setup for this. There are huge gaps in the midfield when we attack leading to easy counters.Is the coaching team/manager so inept that they cant see this?

c)The Board-have continually accepted being mediocre as OK. They have harped on about how being in the CL is in itself a great achievement. This leads to lower expectations from players on what they have to do and hence a subconscious slackening. I for one dont blame RVP for leaving.He wanted more and has left to seek it in a club that wants to win.Good for him

d)The fans-How have thousands of fans continued to support the *** manager for 8 yrs with no signs of improvement from him nor any signs of unrest is beyond me.We are a part of this decline too and have to start the fight back to win our club asap.Stop going to matches.If the team descends into midtable mediocrity then so be it( since the current mediocrity in display appears to be not enough for the w*****s in the board to sack the manager).I for one would like AW to be sacked and replaced with someone young and fresh- a laudrup or klopp.
+1 #6 pop 2013-03-06 05:49
Tactically we are inept. Certain players are not good enough within our current system. I watch other teams with gameplans, where's ours? We are all too predictable and make it easy for teams to play against us. We lack drive on most occasions. When we are performing, our defence will do something stupid and ruin the day. I don't blame the players, they were invited to play for us. Only one person to blame for the state of the team. And the board should not have let it happen.
-2 #5 Ricky 2013-03-05 20:56
The fans, moan, moan, moan and live in the past.
+2 #4 wen-go 2013-03-05 20:43
the problem with arsenal is no1 listens 2 the problem besides fans .. ridiculous !!! sad
-4 #3 speakupspencer 2013-03-05 19:49
PSG & R.Madrid would not touch him. He's passed it. The Premiership moved on and his ego would not let him seek an innovator as a assistant manager and so it left him and us behind. He earns millions of pounds a year though so I guess he does not care. I pronounce his name "wanker" by the way and so do a lot of Arsenal fans.
+2 #2 iwasthere 2013-03-05 18:28
Wherever you look you can apportion blame:
An owner who doesn't invest, doesn't care and doesn't communicate.
A board who doesn't challenge, and is all but meaningless.
A business model that produces profit largely by selling prime assets
A manager who wastes money on mediocrity and doesn't reward excellence all in the name of a socialist style wage structure.
A manager who has not evolved his thinking and methods for the last x number of years, who is stubborn in the extreme, who doesn't instill discipline and cohesiveness and organisation in the team; has made a habit of choosing captains for the wrong reason with inevitable disastrous results.
But what scares me more? Wenger leaving and having this inept board and owner choosing a new man who will be as much a carbon copy as they can get, or Wenger staying and delivering more of the same.

Oh yes - and I DO NOT blame the players for the most part. Too often played out of position, too often over-used due to lack of suitable depth of squad and not receiving the coaching and teaching they must crave. Yes, there are some dud players, but, even ignoring Ferguson, Mourinho, Guardiola, Klupp, etc, don't tell me that a Laudrup, a Moyes, a VillaBoas, could not get more from the squad than is being provided by the current man in charge.

Not happy as you can see but don't see either an easy or quick way out.
+3 #1 Stonroy 2013-03-05 18:05
Name one other manager who has helmed a continuing decline for 8 years and managed to turn it around and win something. It's over and it's gone beyond who is to blame. For the sake of the club and for Wenger it's time to part ways because I can assure you the decline will not stop next no matter who he brings in.