It was the nightmare of Bradford revisited. A somnambulant display allowing well-organised lower league opposition to knock Arsenal out of a cup competition.
Wojciech Szczesny - 5 – He had very little to do, but was one of three players at fault for the goal. Saved the first effort from Martin Olsson, but needed to parry it away from goal, rather than back into the penalty area, allowing Colin Kazim-Richards to score the winner.
Francis Coquelin - 5 – His distribution from wide was ordinary, and always looked vulnerable defensively. Being beaten in the air was the first in the chain of dominoes to fall for the goal.
Laurent Koscielny – 6 – Relatively unruffled in defence, but could have covered Coquelin quicker than he did to stop Olsson unleashing the shot, which led to Kazim-Richards goal.
Thomas Vermaelen - 6 – He may be unfairly blamed for not getting back on the line to prevent Blackburn's winner. He made some solid interventions before then, but his contributions when trying to attack were below his usual standard.
Nacho Monreal - 5 – Had little to do at the back, but was needed to give attacking thrust on the left flank, as Blackburn clogged up the centre of the pitch. However, his passing and crossing was moribund.
Mikel Arteta - 6 – Was allowed to control the midfield, and did so efficiently. However, his passing was more sideways than incisive. And he missed a great chance in the dying embers of the match, lashing a shot into the side-netting.
Abou Diaby - 4 – He needed to give verticality to the midfield, but Diaby's shuttling runs from box to box were conspicuous by their absence. He had a first-half header well saved by Jamie Kean, but this was a shoddy performance, exacerbated by his lethargic passing, often slowing down attacks.
Tomas Rosicky - 6 – Didn't provide the usual alacrity to the forward play that we normally see from the Czech. However, he was still the best of a bad bunch. Put Gervinho clear with a delightful through-ball, and was unlucky to see a shot crash off the bar, just before he was substituted.
Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain - 4 – He was symptomatic of Arsenal's attacking display. He had plenty of the ball, but did nothing with it. Be it his dribbling, crossing or set-pieces, Oxlade-Chamberlain struggled to find a teammate, and should have been substituted earlier than he was.
Olivier Giroud - 5 – In Giroud's defence, the service he had was non-existent. But that's as far as I can defend him. His link-up play with the midfield was atrocious, his passing wasn't much better. He may have been fatigued, or he may have been disinterested, but Giroud was a vacant presence.
Gervinho - 5 – If I'm honest, I expect that people will find this rating generous. I'm sure the Ivorian will be the lightning rod for the ire that will come with the defeat. Personally, I felt that Gervinho was no worse than most of the Arsenal players. But his miss when played through by Rosicky was poor, and proved costly.
SUBS
Jack Wilshere – n/a – Spent a lot of his time on the left, when I would rather have seen him play off Giroud. But he was still a threat, almost creating an equaliser for Arteta.
Santi Cazorla- n/a – Wasn't able to find much space, and had a couple of shots blocked. But he should have been given more time on the pitch to make a difference
Theo Walcott – n/a – Had a penalty shout turned down, and gave more down the right than Oxlade-Chamberlain. However, he was the third man at fault for Blackburn's goal, as he didn't track Olsson's forward burst from left back.
An embarrassing result maybe, but who – hand on heart – can say that they were truly shocked by the loss? Far too many of the players are unwilling to consistently take responsibility for making the difference in matches.
Whatever happens against Bayern Munich, this result is more damaging.
We're not good enough to win the Champions League, but we could have won the FA Cup.
The trophy drought is getting ever nearer to double figures.
Latest:
Comments
Yeah it must be getting to him.I still believe Wenger wants to win things,just can't say the same about the owner and the board!
I just wonder, if we really had an oil billionaire owner who wanted trophies, wouldn't the same Wenger have a squad of 'exceptional' players?
I do not for a moment think AW does not want to win trophies. He wants it as every true fan of Arsenal. But he has to toe the line set by the owners.
Yeah i feel for Wenger to a degree,because the owner doesn't back him and forces him to sell his best players.We have average players because that's all Wenger is allowed to buy.Kroenke is a disgrace and i wish he left asap.I don't trust Kroenke at all,and think he's only interested in making money,and he doesn't give a damn about the fans or winning silverware.Because surely he knows that he won't have success if he keeps selling the best players on for profit.Just seen Wenger on skysports news,and it's clear the pressure of him not winning things is getting to him.The press are even starting to question him.But i still question alot of Wengers signings lately as they've been poor,and i critcise him for how poor we are defensively.
Totally agree.
Although I doubt if this is entirely AW's fault.
Thoughts that comes to mind:
1. If Wenger leaves, will it make any difference?
2. Or will Kroenke find someone who will simply continue the decline, perhaps even quicker, while he pockets the profits?
Like you asked how is AW still in the job? I do not think he would still be in the job if he was not delivering what the owner wants.
AW's priority is with the owner and the board, not the fans.
Maybe Wenger has realised that winning the CL is our only way to be in the UCL next year. Which, perhaps, to him (and/or the board) is a bigger trophy than the FA Cup.
Why did he have to take a risk? 8 years without a trophy, and FA cup was our best chance of winning one this season. So why gamble?
Quote: Alex Ferguson can afford to take risks. He/they are not in a trophy drought like us for so many years. We cannot and shouldn't compare our situation with Sir AF's or Manu's.
Quote: Precisely, why we shouldn't be taking a risk in any of our matches. Why go on to the pitch if the aim is not to win?
Even if we loose to Bayern, it`s not the time to go against the team, show your support, every negative word you say will only benefit Tottenham Chelsea Everton and all the other rivals, show your team, who you support, heads up, we will be back, to the winning ways, believe and Support, they need it and we need to show our colours, more than maybe ever, you can always find a judas or many, but we are a team and a team stick together, through all kinds of ***, why shouldn`t we...
Out: Kroenke; Gazidis; Hillwood; Wenger; Fabiansky; Scezny; Squillachi; Vermaelen; Koscielny; Djourou; Santos; Ramsey; Diaby; Rosicky; Gervinho; Park; Chamakh; Bendtner.
I would say that these sides were obviously NOT strong enough.We kid ourselves in the belief that Arsenal have more than one or two "World Class" Players.If we do they weren't starting today.Those that were, should have been good enough to beat a mid-table Championship Side ,at home.Once again,our over-rated Manager seems to have failed in his ability to suitably motivate his side.
As Fans we are now beyond the realms of frustration.It's frustrating to support a side who are just a couple of players short of being a really good team;it is frustrating to know that a side is capable of winning competitions if the Manager was a little more flexible with his tactical strategy,it is frustrating to lose our best players because they have decided that silverware is only going to be won elsewhere.
If the Club is to move forward then it's time to sweep clean.A new Manager with new ideas suited to the present as opposed to the 1990s.A Board that has the ability to run a Club as opposed to keep quiet in the absence of the Owner.
This team is simply not good enough but with the right management could,at least,move into the realms of competitive consistency.
All those years, all that money and still crap!